Civilizational factors of the formation of Russian elites in the context of the problem of historical memory as a foundational element of political culture

Introduction. In modern conditions, research on the problems of the civilizational context in the formation of Russian elites is being updated, taking into account historical retrospect. This is a necessary element of elitist research, which makes it possible to deepen our understanding of the mechanisms of elite formation in the political history of Russia and, at the same time, to represent the urgent problem of reproduction and preservation of historical memory as a foundational element of political culture and the prerequisites for its formation based on traditional values.

Purpose. Identification of the civilizational context in the formation of Russian elites, taking into account the analysis of historical retrospect.

Methods. When conducting the research, the author applied the historical and genetic approach; comparative historical and political analysis; civilizational approach (political science aspect).

Results. The article identifies and analyzes the civilizational factors of the formation of Russian elites in Soviet Russia, in the mobilization conditions of the Second World War in the context of the problems of historical memory as a foundational element of political culture, as well as the problems of circulation, rotation, transformation and change of political elites. There are 4 generations of Soviet elites: the Leninist, Stalinist, Khrushchev-Brezhnev and Gorbachev elites. The specifics of the unique civilizational context and the common archetypal features of the Russian elites are shown, and the quality of the elites is assessed from the point of view of the civilizational-elitist approach.

Conclusions. By the end of the Soviet era, a type of bureaucrat had crystallized-an official, a party and nomenklatura functionary, a representative of the political and administrative elite who aspires to privileges and career advancement. At the same time, in the confrontation between communist and capitalist ideology, the countries of the socialist and capitalist camps, in the process of radical renormalization of values, individual representatives of the elite and political leaders showed genuine patriotism, self-sacrifice and strategic talent for leading the country, turning it into a superpower. This is typical of the period of the militaristic-mobilization state of the socio-political system, in the situation of the Great Patriotic War, since in the face of an external threat, the people and the political elite rallied on the basis of patriotic ideology, traditional political culture, and the national interests of Russia.

1. Belsky V. Y. Memory of ancestors: the unifying power of history [Review of the book: Kiknadze V. G. The Power of the V Truth. Protection of historical memory as a strategic national priority of Russia. Moscow: Veche, 2022. 320 p.]. Science. Society. Defense. 2023;2(35):22-22. (In Russ.)

2. Vodenko K. V. Historical memory management as a way of forming the national identity of a multiethnic society. Bulletin Social-Economic and Humanitarian Research. 2021;12(14):81–88. (In Russ.)

3. Suvorov V. L. The Great Victory: lessons of the past and challenges of the present. Military historical magazine. 2021;(5):4–9. (In Russ.)

4. Rusakova O. F. On the issue of the concept of "memory policy regime": methodological analysis. Discourse-Pi. 2023;(1):27–45. (In Russ.)

5. Kuchukov M. M. Historical consciousness as a phenomenon of socio-cultural regulation of behavior of subjects of civil society. International Scientific Research Journal. 2021;12(114):84–88. (In Russ.)

6. Kislitsyn S. A. The Soviet Communist ruling elite. In: Russian Historical Political Science. Rostov-onDon; 1999:138–160. (In Russ.)

7. Ashin G. K. Elitiology: history, theory, modernity: monograph. Moscow: MGIMO, 2010. 600 p. ISBN 978-5-9228-0582-7. (In Russ.)

8. Kislitsyn S. A., Lubsky A. V. The elites and counter-elites of Russia. Issues of theory and political practice. Rostov-on-Don; 2014:100–121. (In Russ.)

9. Did Russia have a choice? (N. I. Bukharin and V. M. Chernov in the socio-philosophical discussions of the 20s). Collection of articles. Ed. by B. V. Bogdanov. Moscow: IF RAS, 1996. 175 p. (In Russ.)

10. Pantin I. K. The Russian Revolution: ideas, ideology, practice. Moscow: Summer Garden; 2015. 294 p. (In Russ.)

11. Lubsky A. V. State power in Russia (historical realities and problems of legitimacy). In: Russian Historical Political Science. Rostov-on-Don, 1999:47–94. (In Russ.)

12. The Socialist ideal and real socialism: Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin. Under the general editorship of I.G. Abramson and others. Moscow: LENAND; 2011. 616 p. (In Russ.)

13. Vorobyov A. V. "The Red Consensus" – October 1917 in the national memory of modern Russian society. Ethnodialogues. 2021;3-4(65-66):141–154. (In Russ.)

14. Trotsky L. D. On the history of the Russian Revolution. Moscow: Politizdat; 1990. 447 p. (In Russ.)

15. Avtorkhanov A. G. Technology of power. Moscow: "Russian Chess House"; 2019. 898 p. ISBN 978-594693-747-4. (In Russ.)

16. Prokhorov A. P. The Russian management model. Moscow: ZAO "Expert Magazine"; 2002. 376 p. (In Russ.)

17. Sarantsev N. V. The elite of the Red Army during the Great Patriotic War. Industry: economics, management, technology. 2004;(9). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/elita-krasnoy-armii-v-gody-velikoyotechestvennoy-voyny (date of reference: 01/27/2024). (In Russ.)

18. Gaman-Golutvina O. V. Political elites of Russia. Milestones of historical evolution: a monograph. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia [ROSSPEN]; 2006. 446 p. (In Russ.)