Application of quantitative models of regional development balance
https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-1-146-151
Abstract
The article discusses why there has been a change in the research paradigm towards quantitative methods in regional development. Factor assessment no longer met modern requirements for the development of markets and industries. However, questions remained, it was not clear to what extent the theoretical results for stylized spatial conditions would be qualitatively and quantitatively generalized to more realistic conditions in the theoretical and empirical literature on the new regional economy. Quantitative models, which are most often used in regional studies, were able to integrate three directions: spatial development, take into account the multiplicity of regional processes, and all parameters used can be identified.
About the Authors
А. Albert I. Sadykov
Russian University of Transport (MIIT)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Albert I. Sadykov - the Applicant
Moscow
N. V. Kapustina
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nadezhda V. Kapustina – Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Economic Security and Risk Management of the Faculty of Economics and Business
Moscow
References
1. Korotaev A., Vaskin I., Bilyuga S. The Olson-Huntington hypothesis of a curvilinear relationship between the level of economic development and socio-political destabilization: a quantitative analysis. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie = Sociological review. 2017;16(1):9-49. (In Russ.)
2. Blanutsa V. I. Problems of development of socio-economic zoning in the era of "big data". Regional'nye issledovaniya = Regional studies. 2017(2):4-11. (In Russ.)
3. Kosobutskaya A. Yu., Treshchevsky Yu. I, Prachenko A. A. The high variability of institutional dynamics is the basis for the instability of regional economic systems. Teoreticheskaya ekonomika = Theoretical economics. 2022; May 31;89(5):86. (In Russ.)
4. Oomes N., Ohnsorge F. Money demand and inflation in dollarized economies: The case of Russia. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2005 Sep 1;33(3):462-483.
5. Debreu G. Economic theory in the mathematical mode. The American Economic Review. 1984 Jun 1;74(3):267-278.
6. Banerjee A., Duflo E, Qian N. "On the road: Access to transportation infrastructure and economic growth in China". Journal of Development Economics. 145 (2020): 102442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102442
7. Sedova N.V., Pridorozhnaya T.A. Structural Analysis of Capital Investments in the System of Investment Planning of the Russian Federation. Finance and Credit. 2018; 24, no. 10 (778): 2347–58. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/re.volsu.2020.3.12
8. Lucas Jr R. Expectations and the Neutrality of Money. Journal of economic theory. 1972 Apr 1;4(2): 103-124.
9. Redding S.J. The empirics of new economic geography. Journal of Regional Science. 2010. Feb;50(1):297-311.
10. Alvarez F., Lucas Jr. R. General equilibrium analysis of the Eaton–Kortum model of international trade. Journal of Monetary Economics. 2007 Sep 1;54(6):1726-68.
11. Fujita M., Thisse J.F. Economics of agglomeration. Journal of the Japanese and international economies. 1996 Dec 1;10(4):339-378.
12. Eaton J., Kortum S., Kramarz F. Dissecting trade: Firms, industries, and export destinations. American Economic Review. 2004 May;94(2):150-154.
13. Allen T., Arkolakis C. The welfare effects of transportation infrastructure improvements. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2019 Jan 28.
14. Lucas Jr RE. Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society. 1978, vol. 46, issue 6, 1429-1445.
Review
For citations:
Albert I. Sadykov , Kapustina N.V. Application of quantitative models of regional development balance. State and municipal management. Scholar notes. 2023;(1):146-151. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-1-146-151
Views:
6
Email this article 