Empirical research on sustainable business model innovation for industrial enterprises driven by digital capability in China

Introduction

In the era of Industry 4.0, the digital economic environment has high uncertainty and unpredictability. As an critical subject of the real economy, traditional industrial enterprises need to use digital technology and disruptive thinking to innovate their business models in order to help enterprises better and faster realize digital transformation and sustainable development if they want to survive and develop in such a complex and volatile market environment. In accordance with this, the purpose of the study is an empirical study of the relevant processes.

Materials and methods

Through literature review and analysis, the theoretical models of digital ability, sustainable business model innovation, digital opportunity discovery and digital opportunity creation are constructed. The measure scales of the above four variables are also designed. Through the empirical research on the questionnaire survey of well-known industrial enterprises in 31 provincial administrative regions in China, the descriptive statistical analysis, structural analysis, correlation analysis and regression analysis of variables of the questionnaire were carried out by using the data analysis software SPSS 22.0.

Results

The study showed, that the digital ability of industrial enterprises have a significant positive impact on sustainable business model innovation. Digital opportunity discovery and digital opportunity creation play a continuous intermediary role between them. The theoretical model and hypothesis have been verified.

Conclusions

The views and conclusions of this research can find practical implementation for industrial enterprises in the current digital environment. However, the establishment, application and promotion of enterprises' digital capabilities and the mechanism on how affect business model innovation are a complex, long-term and dynamic process. Whether enterprises in different industries or in different regions can obtain the same research conclusions in different development stages and different economic environments remains to be further studied.

1. Wu Y., Du, M. Business Model Innovation: Research review and prospects. Business economics research. 2019;(04):103–106.

2. Hart S.L., Milstein M.B. Creating sustainable value. Journal of academy of management executive. 2003;(17):56–67.

3. Autio E., Nambisan S., Thomas L.D.W., Wright M. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic entrepreneurship journal. 2018;(12): 72–95.

4. Teece D.J, Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal. 1997;(18):509–533.

5. Khin S., Ho T.C.F. Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance. International Journal of Innovation Science. 2019;(11):177–195.

6. Nambisan S. Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2017;(41):1029–1055.

7. Schaltegger S., Hansen E.G., Lüdeke-Freund F. Business models for sustainability: Origins, present research, and future avenues. Organization & Environment. 2016;(29):3–10.

8. Bocken N., Short S., Rana P. A value mapping tool for sustainable business modelling. Corporate governance. 2013;(13):482–497.

9. Haynie J.M., Shepherd D.A., McMullen J.S. An opportunity for me? The role of resources in opportunity evaluation decisions. Journal of management studies. 2009;(46):337–361.

10. Ray P., Ray S. Resource-constrained innovation for emerging economies: The case of the indian telecommunications industry. Engineering management, IEEE transactions on, 2010;(57): 144–156.

11. Chen H, Sichev D, Liu W. Disruptive innovation: Theory, practice, and the chinese context. Journal of systems managemen. 2019;(28):1021–1028.

12. Tan B., Pan S.L., Lu X., Huang L. The role of IS capabilities in the development of multi-sided platforms: The digital ecosystem strategy of alibaba.com. Journal of the association for information systems. 2015;(16):248–280.

13. Renko M., Shrader R.C., Simon M. Perception of entrepreneurial opportunity: A general framewor. Management decision. 2012;(50):1233–1251.

14. Tauscher K, Laudien S.M. Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces. European Management Journal. 2018;(36):319–329.

15. Patrick G., Patrick H. Digital sustainable entrepreneurship: A business model perspective on embedding digital technologies for social and environmental value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;(272):22817.

16. Li W., Du W., Yin J. Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem as a new form of organizing: the case of Zhongguancun. Frontiers of business research in China. 2017;(11):69–100.

17. George G., Bock A.J. The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship theory and practice. 2011;(35):83–111.

18. González M F, Husted B W, Aigner D J. Opportunity discovery and creation in social entrepreneurship: An exploratory study in Mexico. Journal of business research. 2017;(8):212–220.

19. Boons F, Lüdeke-Freund F. Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of cleaner production. 2013;(45):9–19.

20. Bocken N., Boons F., Baldassarre B. Sustainable business model experimentation by understanding ecologies of business models. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;(208):1498–1512.