Потенциал интернет-коммуникаций в политическом развитии граждан в современном обществе: методология исследований

В статье авторы анализируют дискурс интернет коммуникаций в современном открытом обществе, анализируют теоретические конструкты раскрывающие политический  потенциал интернет коммуникаций, влияния политических активностей граждан на их политическое участие. В статье авторы заключают, что существуют различные модели взаимодействия  органов публичного управления, публичной коммуникации.  

1. Putnam R. Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital// Journal of Democracy.1995. № 6(1).

2. Bolshakova Y. M., Nikonov S. B., Puiu Y. V. Cloud Technologies in the Promotion Strategy of Integrated Communications // Asian Social Science. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education. 2015. Vol. 11, No. 19.

3. Morris, M., & Ogan, C. (1996). The Internet as a Mass Medium. Journal of Communication, 46, 39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01460.x

4. Smith, A., Rainee, L. The internet and the 2008 election. Washington: Pew Internet and American Life Project. 2009. Av.: http://www.pewinternet.org/

5. Bolshakova Yu.M., Mokhalchenkova N.A., Istikhovskay M.D. Innovative Media Technologies as a Way to Address Socially Important Issues// GMJ-Global Media Journal. Social institutions, groups, relations within the globalization context and society virtualization 2016. Vol. Special Issue No.S3:19.

6. Adorno T., Horkeheimer M. Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: Verso. 1997.

7. Dahlberg, L. Net-Public Sphere Research: Beyond the ‘First Phase’ // The Public. 2004.№ 11(1).

8. Barney D. One Nation Under Google. Citizenship in the Technological Republic. The Heart House Lecture Commitee. University of Toronoto: Toronto. 2007. Av.: http://www.mcgill.ca/files/arts/barney_2007HartHouseLecture.pdf.

9. Bimber B. The Internet and Citizen Communication With Government: Does the Medium Matter? // Political Communication. 1999.16(4). Pp. 409-428.

10. Habermas J. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1996. Pp. 442-443.

11. Zittel T. Political Communication and Electronic Democracy: American Exceptionalism or Global Trend? Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases and Challenges. New York. Cambridge University Press. 2004.

12. Schneider S. M. Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer-Mediated Communication: Political Discussion about Abortion in a Usenet Newsgroup. Doctoral Disseration in Political Science, Massachusetts: MIT.1997.

13. Salter L. Democracy, New Social Movements, and the Internet. A Habermasian Analysis. In M.McCaughey & M.Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: online activism in theory and practice. New York: Routledge 2003. Pp. 117-44.

14. Norris P. Preaching to the Converted? Pluralism, Participation and Party Websites. Party Politics, 2003. № 9(1).

15. Katz J. Birth of a digital nation. Wired. 1997.№ 5(4). pp. 49-52, 184-191. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/5.04/netizen.html.

16. Dahlberg, L. Computer-Mediated Communication and The Public Sphere: A Critical Analysis// Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2001. № 7(1). Av.: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol7/issue1/dahlberg.html.

17. Stromer-Galley K.A. et. al. What Citizens Want, Where they Went, and What they Got Online in the US Election 2000. In: S. Coleman (Ed.), Elections in the age of the internet: lessons from the United States. London: Hansard Society. 2001. Pp. 26–35.