The concept of a sovereign state in the conditions of globalization
https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-2-210-217
Abstract
The article analyzes the actual problems of the political processes of the modern state, understanding its role and place in world political processes in the context of globalization. The article examines in detail the problems of conceptualizing a sovereign state in the context of globalization, challenges and increased conflict in world political processes. The article assesses the risks and challenges to a sovereign state in the context of neoliberalism, highlights the role of global economic and political institutions in the implementation of neoliberal approaches and principles of global regulation.
About the Authors
Irina V. Leskova
Russian State Social University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina V. Leskova – Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Political Science and Applied Political Work,
Moscow.
Yulia N. Manaenkova
Russian State Social University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yulia N. Manaenkova – Applicant of the Department of Political Science and Applied Political Work,
Moscow.
Mikhail E. Zubarev
Russian State Social University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mikhail E. Zubarev – Competitor of the Department of Political Science and Applied Political Work,
Moscow.
References
1. Stasavage D. The Rise and Decline of Democracy. A global history from antiquity to today. Prinston and Oxford, Princeton University Press; 2020.
2. Stoyadinović M,. Matij P. Desovereignization of National Dzhava in the Process of Globalization. Globalization and Sovereignty – with a reference to Bosna and Herzegovina /under. Ed. B.Kovachević / European Defendology Center. Basha Luka. 2014.
3. Naomi Klajn, The Shock Doctrine – Capitalism Favors Disaster. Samizdat B92. 2009.
4. Gaћinoviћ R. National well-being as a factor in the functioning of the modern dzhava. Military Affairs, Ministry of Choice. 2017;(1):89–90.
5. Saњa Stoshiћ, Aleksandar Ђorђeviћ, Multiculturalism of modern times and national identity. Srpska politician misao. Institute for politics studio. Beograd; 2018;(3).
6. Olson K. Deliberative democracy. In: B. Fultner (Ed.), Jürgen Habermas: Key Concepts. Acumen Publishing. 2011.pp. 140-155. doi: 10.1017/UPO9781844654741.008
7. The rise and fall of the Washington Consensus as a paradigm for developing countries’. World Development. 2000;28(5):789–804.
8. Rajkot T., The Limits of Neoliberal Globalization. Montenegrin Journal of Economics. Economic Laboratory for Transition Research. 2020;16(4):157-170.
9. Gutorov V.A. Globalization and the crisis of the modern state. Scientific works of the North-Western Institute of Management RANEPA. Saint-Petersburg. 2017;8(3(30)):60-78. (In Russ.)
10. Vukashin P. Drzhava and Democracy. Samrema Drzhava: structure and social function / ed. Vukashin P., Stoјiљkoviћ Z./ Faculty of Political Science, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. Beograd. 2010, pp. 44–45.
11. Noam Chomsky. Democracy controlled. CID Podgorica; 1999.
12. World Bank. Accelerated Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Agenda for Action, Washington, DC: World Bank, 1981.
13. Stoјiљkoviћ Z., Post(liberal) democracy, capitalism and crisis dzhava. In: Urushava or demolition of democracy? / ed. Vuјachiћ I., Vraniћ B. / Friendship for political science and Serbia, Faculty of political science. Beograd. 2016.
14. Shigeki J. Neoliberal Globalization: Critiques and Alternatives. Theological Studies. 2008;69(2):321-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/004056390806900205
15. Anderle J., Coffer R. Long-Term Trends in Rural Depopulation and Their Implications for Community Banks. FDIC Quarterly. 2014;8(2):44-59.
16. Held, D., McGrew, A. et al. 1999. Global Transformations. Politics, Economics and Culture. Cambridge Polity Press.
17. Fukuyuma F. The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order. New York: Free Press, 1999.
18. Roberts M.T. Globalization and Neoliberalism: Structural Determinants of Global Mental Health? Humanity & Society. 2021;45(4):471-508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597620951949
19. Obrenoviћ Z. National dzhava and izazov globalization. Philosophy and friendship of the XIX and XX centuries. Beograd; 2002.
20. Stoyadinovich M. Neoliberalism and the non-imperialist concept of globalization. Bulletin of the Cherepovets State University. 2013;2-1(47):35–38.(In Russ.)
21. Bartelson J. Three Concepts of Globalization. International Sociology. 2000;(15):180-196.
22. Lawson J. Mounting Turbulence in Neoliberal Globalization: Political Economy, Populist Discourse, and Policy in Alberta, Canada. Soc. Sci. 2022;(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11050221
23. Stupar M. Svetsky Poredak, Globalization and Nutrition of Sovereignty. Philosophy and Friendship XXI, University near Beograd, Institute for Philosophy and Friendship Theory, Beograd, 2002:274-282.
24. Naim M. Fads and fashions in economic reforms. Third World Quarterly. 2000;21(3):505-528.
25. Harvey D. Brief history of neoliberalism: current reading. Transl. from English. N. S. Bragina. Moscow: Generation; 2007. ISBN 978-5-9763-0022-4 (In Russ.)
26. Westergaard John. Where does the Third Way lead? New Political Economy. 2009;4(3):429-436.
Review
For citations:
Leskova I.V., Manaenkova Yu.N., Zubarev M.E. The concept of a sovereign state in the conditions of globalization. State and municipal management. Scholar notes. 2023;(2):210-217. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-2-210-217
Views:
4
Email this article 