Party competition and party hierarchy: from classical interpretations to modern Russian cases
https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-3-153-161
EDN: UOSLUC
Abstract
The article is devoted to understanding such important processes of partogenesis as party competition and party hierarchy, based on the theoretical and methodological ideas of M. Duverger and R. Dahl. The phenomenological and institutional resources of competition and hierarchy are considered, both in terms of general objective circumstances and in terms of environmental factors. The alignment of the hierarchy of modern parliamentary parties of the Russian Federation is traced. A political analysis of three party-competitive cases, which are carried out in modern party competition and party hierarchy, is carried out. «Party patriotism» is nominated as an ideological and program complex of the unity of political parties in support of the state and power. The problematic aspects of party competition and party hierarchy and factors of their possible transformation are revealed.
About the Authors
M. A. AstvatsaturovaRussian Federation
Maya A. Astvatsaturova – Doct. Sci. (Polit.), Professor, Director of the Scientific and Educational Center for Political and Ethnopolitical Research of Pyatigorsk State University.
Pyatigorsk
L. Kh. Dzakhova
Russian Federation
Larisa Kh. Dzakhova – Doct. Sci. (Polit.), Head of the Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences of North Ossetian State University named after K. L. Khetagurov.
Vladikavkaz
I. M. Statsenko
Russian Federation
Ivan M. Statsenko – Postgraduate of the Institute of Training of Highly Qualified Personnel of Pyatigorsk State University, a member of the political council of the Zheleznovodsk local branch of the United Russia Party.
Pyatigorsk
References
1. Hayek F fon. Competition as an opening procedure. World Economy and International Relations. 1989;(12):6–14. (In Russ.)
2. Porter M. Competition: competitive advantages of countries: Moscow: Alpina Publisher. 2016. 947 p. (In Russ.)
3. Yudanov A. Yu. Competition. Theory and practice. Financial Academy. under the Government of the Russian Federation. 3rd ed. Moscow: Gnome and D; 2001. 304 p.
4. Kashpur V.V. The concept of "competition" in the research of the education system: methodological grounds for application. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. 2007;(298):42–44. (In Russ.)
5. Duverger M. Political parties. Trans. with fr. L.A. Zimina. Moscow: Academic project; 2002. 560 p. (In Russ.)
6. Dahl R. Democracy and its critics. Transl. from English. Edited by M.V. Ilyin. Moscow: "Russian Political Encyclopedia" (ROSSPEN); 2003. 576 p. (In Russ.)
7. Dahl R. Polyarchy, pluralism and space. Available from: http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Polit/dal/pol_pl.php [Accessed 20 June 2023]. (In Russ.)
8. Libman A. M. Institutional competition and post-Soviet transformation. Social sciences and modernity. 2006;(6):53–64. (In Russ.)
9. Vishnevsky B. L. Political competition in Russia: chronicle of decline. Political expertise: POLITEX. 2007;3(2):286–295. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Astvatsaturova M.A., Dzakhova L.Kh., Statsenko I.M. Party competition and party hierarchy: from classical interpretations to modern Russian cases. State and municipal management. Scholar notes. 2023;(3):153-161. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-3-153-161. EDN: UOSLUC





















