Models of network adaptive interaction of organizations in conditions of decision making by the dominant owner about implementation of the project

In modern business conditions, the network interaction of organizations is one of the most effective forms of cooperation within the framework of the project. The ability of the network to adapt to changing factors and conditions of the external and internal environment based on the reactive management of business processes of project interaction ensures not only the achievement of project goals, but also the satisfaction of the complementary interests of all counterparties. The process of developing the author's model includes an analysis of existing models of network interaction between organizations, the study of methods and approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of such interaction, as well as the identification of key factors influencing the success of the project. The results obtained will improve the understanding of the processes of networking between organizations in the implementation of projects, as well as develop recommendations to improve the effectiveness of such interaction. The results can also be useful both for the scientific community and for practitioners involved in project management and business processes in a network context. The methodological basis of the study was the methods of comparative and logical analysis, induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis. As a result of the work carried out, the author's model of network adaptive interaction of organizations was formed in the conditions of decision-making by the dominant owner on the implementation of the project.

1. Williamson O. The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes. Journal of Economic Literature. 1981;19(4):1538.

2. Tambovtsev V. L. Contract model of the firm's strategy. Lomonosov Moscow State University. Econ. fact. Moscow: TEIS; 2000. 83 p. (In Russ.)

3. Provan K. G., Fish A., Sydow J. Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management. 2007;33(3):479–516. DOI: 10.1177/0149206307302554

4. Haken G. Self-Organizing Society. Synergetic paradigm. Social Synergetics. Moscow: Progress-Tradition; 2009:350–369. (In Russ.)

5. Grandori A., Soda G. Inter-firm networks: antecedents, mechanisms and forms. Organization Studies. 1995;16(2):183-214. DOI: 10.1177/017084069501600201.

6. Maevsky V. I. Mesolevel and hierarchical structure of the economy. Journal of Institutional Research. 2018;10(3):18–29. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2018.10.3.018-029. (In Russ.)

7. Pryke S. Badi S., Almadhoob H., Soundararaj B., Addyman S. Self-organizing networks in complex infrastructure projects. Project Management Journal. 2018;49(2):18–41.

8. Argyres N., Bercovitz J., Zanarone G. The role of relationship scope in sustaining relational contracts in interfirm networks. Strategic Management Journal. 2020;41(2):222-245. DOI: 10.1002/smj.3095.

9. Baker G., Gibbons R., Murphy K. J. Subjective performance measures in optimal incentive contracts. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1994;(109):1125–1156. DOI: 10.2307/2118358.

10. Models of network interaction of cluster-type institutions of pedagogical education for the level of additional professional education. N. N. Surtaeva, O. V. Roitblat, O. N. Surtaeva, S. V. Ivanova, P. B. Surtaev. SPb-Tyumen: TOGIRRO; 2017. 88 p. (In Russ.)

11. Khoreva L. V., Belykh A. L., Shraer A. V. Ecosystem as an innovative form of network interfirm cooperation. Information and economic aspects of standardization and technical regulation. 2019;6(52):48–53. (In Russ.)

12. George M. L. Lean six sigma for service. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2003. 400 p.

13. Andersen B. Business-processes. Tools for improvement. Moscow: Standards and Quality; 2005. 271 p. (In Russ.)

14. Elberg M. S., Tsygankov N. S. Simulation modeling. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Federal University; 2017. 26 p. (In Russ.)

15. Lyandau, Y. V. Building a process-project organizational structure of management. Management in Russia: problems and prospects. 2017;(1):17–22. (In Russ.)

16. Barinov V. A. Reengineering: essence and methodology. Chief mechanic. 2016(1):29–38. (In Russ.)

17. Oikhman E.G., Popov E.V. Reengineering of business: reengineering of organizations and information technologies. Moscow: Finance and Statistics, 1997. 336 p. (In Russ.)

18. Baranov V. V. Reengineering of business processes: stages of development and realization [Electronic resource]. Mode of access: http://www. elitarium. ru/2012/11/14/reinzhiniring_ biznes_processov_ jetapy_razrabotki_realizacii. html. (In Russ.)

19. Yablochnikov E. I., Molochnik V. I., Fomina Y. N. Reengineering of business processes of design and production. St. Petersburg: SPbSUITMO. 2008. 152 p. (In Russ.)

20. Hammer M., Ciampi D. Reengineering the Corporation. Manifesto of the Revolution in Business. M.: Mann. Ivanov and Ferber. 2007. 55 p. (In Russ.)

21. - Mendling, J., Weber I., Van Der Aalst W. & others Blockchains for Business Process Management Challenges and Opportunities. Challenges and Opportunities. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems. 2018. Vol. 9(1). Article 4. [Электронный ресурс] Режим доступа https://backend.or- bit.dtu.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/143775594/1704.03610_1_.pdf DOI: 10.1145/3183367.

22. Telnov Yu.F., Kazakov V.A.; Danilov, A.V.; Bryzgalov A.A. Development of models of production and business processes of network enterprises on the basis of multi-agent systems. Software Products and Systems. 2023;36(4):632–643. DOI: 10.15827/0236-235X.144.632-643. (In Russ.)