Preview

State and municipal management. Scholar notes

Advanced search

The concepts of "political elite" and "political leadership" in the context of the problem of deviation of the elite level of power

https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-3-190-196

EDN: QBGXZB

Abstract

. In the article, the concepts of "political elite", "political leadership" and "deviation" were analyzed in their interrelation and interdependence, the "paradox of elites" was revealed, associated with the duality of their positioning in the system of public morality and management, provided with exclusive powers and resources to establish socio-political norms, realize their own interests, and approve practices Doublethink, transgression and arbitrariness as attributes of political morality based on the paradigm of Machiavellianism and the concept of political efficiency. Since in classical and modern concepts of administrative and bureaucratic elites, their essential characteristics and functionality are determined in accordance with the rational-legal type of domination, the main deviations of their behavior and quality occur in the plane of deviation from the system of rational-legal attitudes and rules. On the one hand, in order to prevent deviations, this focuses on the maximum exclusion of the impact of the so-called "human factor" in political management, associated with the objective tendency of the elite to isolate, distance itself from the majority, its exploitation in the corporate interests of retaining and increasing power, etc. On the one hand, in order to prevent deviations, this focuses on the maximum exclusion of the impact of the so-called "human factor" in political management, associated with the objective tendency of the elite to isolate, distance itself from the majority, its exploitation in the corporate interests of retaining and multiplying power, etc. And, on the other hand, actualizes the problems of the value component in the activity administrative and political elites, the problem of serving the interests of the majority and state strategic development goals, identifying and analyzing mechanisms and models of political governance not only on the basis of legal rationality, but also traditional public values. At the same time, the most promising model of interaction between a political leader and his followers is the constitutional model, and transformational leadership is most consistent with the tasks of parrying the mechanisms of deviation of political elites and the development of civil society in crisis transitions.

About the Author

K. V. Stepanov
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation

Konstantin V. Stepanov – Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminology 

Rostov-on-Don



References

1. Duka A. V. The autocracy of the elites. Why elites are prone to violating norms and rules. In: Russia: history and modernity. Lectures at the Party University. Law, political processes, society, education and culture, foreign and defense policy. Edited by G. M. Mikhaleva. Moscow: RODP "Yabloko"; 2023:119–126. ISBN 978-54399-0084-8. (In Russ.)

2. Pliev S. M. Personality, followers and context: key components of the structure of political leadership. Society and the state. 2024;1(45):54–63. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24412/2224-9125-2024-1-54-63.

3. Davies A. F. Skills, outlooks, and passions: A psychoanalytic contribution to the study of politics. Cambridge, 1980.

4. Zorin V. A. The role of the personal factor in the formation of the presidency in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus: a political and psychological analysis of the personalities of V.V. Putin, L.D. Kuchma and A.G. Lukashenko: Dis. ... Candidate of Political Sciences. Moscow: Moscow State University; 2003. 165 p. (In Russ.)

5. James David Barber. The Presidential Character, 3rd Edition. Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1985.

6. Gozman L. Ya., Shestopal E. B. Political psychology. Rostov-on-Don: Fenix; 1996. 448 p.

7. Egorova E. V. The personal factor in US foreign policy in the 60-90s: Dis. ... Dr. polit. Sciences : 23.00.02. Moscow; 1992. 382 p. (In Russ.)

8. Krichevsky R. L. Psychology of leadership: textbook. Moscow: Statute; 2007. 536 p. (In Russ.)

9. Lukyanov V. Yu. Political science: textbook. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University ITMO; 2007. 231 p. (In Russ.)

10. Stout L. Leadership: from riddles to practice. Moscow: Dobraya kniga; 2002. 320 p. (In Russ.)

11. Burns J. M. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row; 1978. 530 p.

12. Bass B. M., Bass R. The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applica-tions. New York: Free Press; 2008. 1536 p.

13. Khamzina Y. S. The power of transformational leadership. Bulletin of Omsk University. The series "Psychology". 2022;(2):41–46. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24147/2410-6364.2022.2.41-46.


Review

For citations:


Stepanov K.V. The concepts of "political elite" and "political leadership" in the context of the problem of deviation of the elite level of power. State and municipal management. Scholar notes. 2024;(3):190-196. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-3-190-196. EDN: QBGXZB

Views: 4


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-1690 (Print)
ISSN 2687-0290 (Online)