Features of assessing the performance of public-private partnership projects: models and principles

Over the past thirty years, service delivery through public-private partnerships has enabled the government to make significant strides in health, education, water, construction, and transportation. Many of the benefits of such projects have been reported in reports from the National PPP Center, although discussions about the strengths and weaknesses of PPPs have long focused on achieving public policy goals. To achieve maximum benefit, PPP projects should be designed with specific performance improvements in mind, within  a framework that shares risks and rewards between the public and private sectors. The Russian PPP market  is considered complex and quite developed. Nevertheless, despite the sufficient level of development of PPP in the Russian Federation, the lack of effective approaches to measuring the effectiveness of projects was noted as a factor that gives rise to problems associated with corruption and guarantees. According to the reports of  the Ministry of Economic Development, the lack of an effective methodology for measuring the effectiveness of PPPs is the main reason for unsatisfactory demand in the construction sector and natural monopolies. There is a widespread belief that performance evaluation plays a critical role in business planning. Based on this, this study conceptualizes a dynamic model for measuring the performance of public-private partnership projects.

1. Khannanova T. R., Garifullina A. F. Problems of evaluating the effectiveness of the use of publicprivate partnership mechanisms. Jekonomika i upravlenie: nauchno-prakticheskij zhurnal = Economics and Management: a scientific and practical journal. 2019;(1):26–30. (In Russ.)

2. Kyurdzhiev S. P., Shkred V. N. Analysis of the conditions for the development of public-private ownership in the territory of the Russian Federation. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal'noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski = State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2021;(4):104–110. (In Russ.)

3. Maurya, D., & Srivastava, A. K. Managing partner opportunism in public – private partnerships: The dynamics of governance adaptation. Public Management Review. 2019;21(10):1420–1442.

4. Filin D. M. Interaction between business and government in public-private partnership. Nauchnyj poisk = Scientific search. 2019;(1):73–75. (In Russ.)

5. Peshkova, E.P., Kyurdzhiev, S.P., Martazanov, A.A. Strategy for forming financial resources in the context of a conflict of interests between an economic entity and Its Creditors. Proceeding of the International Science and Technology Conference "FarEastСon 2020". Singapore. 2021;(227):1257-1267.

6. Soltangazinov A. R., Isenova G. K., Kaidarova L. K. Models and forms of public-private partnership. Vestnik Belgorodskogo universiteta kooperacii, jekonomiki i prava = Bulletin of the Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law. 2019;5(78):95–104. (In Russ.)

7. Kyurdzhiev S. P., Peshkova E. P. Methods for assessing the efficiency of economic management in the region. Gosudarstvennoye i munitsipal'noye upravleniye. Uchenyye zapiski = State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2014;(1):90–96. (In Russ.)