Preview

State and municipal management. Scholar notes

Advanced search

Traditionalism as a factor of political stability in modern Russian society

https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-1-283-288

EDN: TTFCNZ

Abstract

The article considers traditionalism as a positive factor contributing to the achievement of political stability in Russian society in the modern complex context of aggravating external threats. The object of the study is political stability as a unity of factors and consequences in modern society. Subject of the study – traditionalism as a factor of political stabilization and reintegration of Russian society in the modern context. The study of traditionalism is conducted in the unity of cultural-historical and modern socio-political aspects, due to which this phenomenon is a leading factor of political stability in society and the state, which proclaims traditional values as basic. The study of traditionalism as a factor of the political process in our country is based on the idea of the unity of socio-historical and political science knowledge, forming a single discursive space. Tradition as a multidimensional phenomenon of folk life, synthetically expresses everyday perceptions that influence the political climate in society. The relationship between tradition and innovation in the context of the development of digital technologies as the basis of the communicative process should reach a new level and become part of the practice of political legitimization.

About the Author

A. V. Glazkov
South-Russia Institute of Management – branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Alexander V. Glazkov – Postgraduate Student at the Department of Political Science and Ethnopolitics

Rostov-on-Don



References

1. Lebon G. Psychology of Peoples and Masses. Saint-Petersburg: Maket; 1995. 311 p. (In Russ.)

2. Svistunov A. V. Forms of existence of tradition in modern Russian society Socio-humanitarian knowledge. 2018;(11):203–211. (In Russ.)

3. Gadzhiev K. С. Fundamentalism in the field of intersection of Western and Islamic values. Vlast'. 2015;(3):5–13. (In Russ.)

4. Levin Z. I. Fundamentalism. Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences. 2003. 264 р. (In Russ.)

5. Chelishchev V. I. Features of the fundamentalist worldview. In: The phenomenon of fundamentalism in the modern world: origins, essence and forms. 2006. Р. 4-56. (In Russ.)

6. Khanjyan A. A., Grigoryan D.K. Patriotic discourse and prospects for the formation of a new elite consciousness in modern Russia. Voprosy politologii. 2023;13.1(89):105–116. (In Russ.)

7. Hegel G. V. F. Philosophy of Law. Moscow: Mysl; 1990. (In Russ.)

8. Laloux F. Discovering organizations of the future. 3rd ed. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov & Ferber; 2018. (In Russ.)

9. Grigoryan D. K., Kondratenko E. N., Larkin A. N. The problem of the influence of Internet technologies on the political consciousness of young people in modern Russia. State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes.. 2021;(3):164–168. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2021-1-3-164-168.

10. Grigoryan D. K., Delov N. S., Ganja M. V. Nationalization of the Internet as an instrument of power to control the digital space. Science and Education: economy and economy; entrepreneurship; law and management. 2022;2(141):140–145. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Glazkov A.V. Traditionalism as a factor of political stability in modern Russian society. State and municipal management. Scholar notes. 2024;(1):283-288. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-1-283-288. EDN: TTFCNZ

Views: 5


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-1690 (Print)
ISSN 2687-0290 (Online)