Science and values of a scientist in the context of human society development
https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-4-285-290
EDN: NTKCXM
Abstract
In the article the solution of the evolution of views quite clearly understands and essential knowledge, scientific knowledge, two positions are identified and analyzed - scientism and anti-scientism: scientism, proclaiming the idea of reason as a key tool of cognition, the pinnacle of development, which becomes science in the guaranteed infinity of its capabilities, and anti-scientism, characterizing science in twenty equivalent worldview systems as a method of comprehending relative truths. The purpose of this article is to preserve the problems of the relationship between science and ethics in the historical past; tasks: the key provisions on the issue of “value neutrality” of scientific, developed on the basis of the principles of development of human society are designated. It is emphasized that the question of whether a scientist can be value-neutral, especially in social and humanitarian knowledge, is becoming extremely relevant today. It is noted that the ethics of a scientist is becoming a key section of scientific ethics. The author summarizes that in the context of growing threats and civilizational challenges, the modernity of modernity determines the principle of science and ethics, actualizes the moral code of the scientist, which is approved by the provisions of the course of the Russian Federation on maintaining national security.
About the Author
E. A. SklyarovaRussian Federation
Elena A. Sklyarova – Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Professor at the Department of Philosophy and Methodology of Science of the South-Russian Institute of Management; Professor of Department “Philosophy and World Religions”
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Plato. Dialogues. Moscow: Mysl, 1971. 607 p. (In Russ.).
2. Aristotle. Ethics. Moscow: AST: AST MOSCOW, 2010. 492 p. (In Russ.).
3. Bacon F. New Organon. Moscow: Ripol-Classic, 2021. 364 p. (In Russ.).
4. Kravchenko A.I. The paradox of the beginning: Auguste Comte as a metaphysician and revolutionary. Sociology. 2019. No. 1 [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/paradoksnachala-ogyust-kont-kak-metafizik-i-revolyutsioner/viewer (access date: 03/20/2024). (In Russ.).
5. Weber M. Science as a calling and profession. Selected works. Moscow: Progress, 1990:707-735. (In Russ.).
6. Lenin V.I. Materialism and empirio-criticism [Electronic resource]. Access mode: http://kprf-sverdlovsk.ru/books/V_I_Lenin_Materializm_i_empiriokrititsizm.pdf (date of access: 05/25/2024). (In Russ.).
7. Lenin V.I. On the significance of militant materialism. Selected works in four volumes. T.4. Moscow: Politizdat, 1986. 585 p. (In Russ.).
8. Zigmund K. Precise thinking in crazy times. Moscow: AST: CORPUS, 2021. 528 p. (In Russ.).
9. Guseinov A. A. Ethics of Science [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/etika-nauki/viewer (date of access: 08/28/2024). (In Russ.).
10. Zhdanov Yu. A. Favorites. In 3 volumes. T. 2. Rostov n/d: SKNTs Higher School of Southern Federal University, 2009. 368 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Sklyarova E.A. Science and values of a scientist in the context of human society development. State and municipal management. Scholar notes. 2024;(4):285-290. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-4-285-290. EDN: NTKCXM





















