Mapping of segments of the economic ecosystem of the territory
https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-3-101-110
EDN: ICBHLB
Abstract
Relevance. The rapid introduction of digital technologies into economic activity has marked a new paradigm of economic analysis – the analysis of economic ecosystems. The relevance of the structural study of the economic ecosystems of territories is due to both the weak elaboration of this topic in the world and domestic scientific literature, and the practical need for the formation of scientifically based strategies for the socioeconomic development of territories.
Goal. The purpose of this study is to develop a methodology for mapping the economic ecosystem of the territory.
Materials and methods. The object of this study is the economic ecosystem of the territory. The subject of the study is economic relations for the development of the economic ecosystem of the territory on the basis of mapping its elements. The information base of the research was scientific publications indexed in the Scopus and RSCI databases, as well as the author's results on public management of the development of economic ecosystems. The method of logical system analysis is used as a research method.
Results. As a result of the conducted research, a scheme of a map of the industry and sphere of activity of the economic ecosystem is proposed, including indicators, participants, products of activity, development trends, assessment experts and conclusions on the development of this sphere of economic activity. An algorithm for mapping the economic ecosystem of the territory has been developed, which includes the stages of segmentation, the formation of maps of industries, the assessment of development projects and the formation of a strategy for the socio-economic development of the territory. Using the example of the development of the Tyumen region, the applicability of mapping segments of the economic ecosystem of the territory for public management of the development of various fields of activity is shown. The novelty of this study lies in the development of the author's approach to mapping segments of the economic ecosystem of the territory, which develops the theory of modeling the structure and development of elements of economic ecosystems.
About the Authors
E. V. PopovRussian Federation
Evgeny V. Popov – Corresponding Member of RAS, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Director of the Center for Socio-Economic Investigations
Ekaterinburg
I. P. Chelak
Russian Federation
Igor P. Chelak – Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Deputy Dean of the Faculty of State and Municipal Management
Ekaterinburg
M. M. Skvortsov
Russian Federation
Maksim M. Skvortsov – Candidate for an Academic Degree, Ural Institute of Management – branch of RANEPA; Director of the Department of Economics of the Government of the Tyumen Region
Ekaterinburg; Tyumen
References
1. Moore J. F. The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: Harper Collins; 1997.
2. Popov E. V., Cholak I. P., Skvortsov M.M. Directions of economic analysis based on the results of mapping ecosystems of the territory. Economic analysis: theory and practice. 2023;22(11(542)):2078– 2099. https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.22 (In Russ.)
3. Popov E. V., Skvortsov M. M. Public management of the territory ecosystem development. Problems of territory development. 2023;27(3):10–27. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15838/ptd.2023.3.125.2Z.
4. Dobrowolski, Ł. Sułkowski, P. Adamisin. Innovative ecosystem: the role of lean management auditing. Marketing and Management of Innovations. 2022;(3):9–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.3-01
5. Hazell E. C. Disaggregating ecosystem benefits: An integrated environmental-deprivation index. Sustainability. 2020;12(7589):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187589
6. J. Kim, B. Paek, H. Lee. Exploring innovation ecosystem of incumbents in the face of technological discontinuities: automobile firms. Sustainability. 2022;14(1606):1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031606
7. Jarzabkowski P., Kaplan S. Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice. Strategic Management Journal. 2015;36(4):537–558. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2270
8. Wright R. P., Paroutis S. E., Blettner D. P. How Useful Are the Strategic Tools We Teach in Business Schools? Journal of Management Studies. 2013;50(1):92–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01082.x
9. Adner R. Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management. 2017; 43(1):39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
10. Tebekin A. V., Tebekin P. A., Egorova A. A. Mapping as a kind of frame for the roadmap of knowledge of strategic development prospects. Journal of Economic Research. 2022;8(3):3–16. EDN MKTKMX. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49275612
11. Talmar M., Walrave B., Podoynitsyna K.S., Holmström J., Georges A., Romme L. Mapping, analyzing and designing innovation ecosystems: The Ecosystem Pie Model. Long Range Planning. 2020;53(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.09.002
12. Manyazewal T., Ali M.K., Kebede T., et al. Mapping digital health ecosystems in Africa in the context of endemic infectious and non-communicable diseases, npj. Digit. Med., 2023;6(97). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00839-2
13. Chelak I., Popov E., Skvortsov M. Ecosystems of smart territories: cartographic and economic analysis tools. E3S Web of Conferences. 2024;474(03002):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202447403002
Review
For citations:
Popov E.V., Chelak I.P., Skvortsov M.M. Mapping of segments of the economic ecosystem of the territory. State and municipal management. Scholar notes. 2024;(3):101-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-3-101-110. EDN: ICBHLB






















