Modernization as a political course: analysis of the main conceptual approaches and implementation practices

The article analyzes the transformation of the conceptual provisions of modernization theories into political courses. The author systematized the main provisions of these theories, which were reflected in the reform programs, and were recommended by international intergovernmental organizations as approaches to the implementation of state transformations. Based on the analysis, the author draws attention to the fact that the concept of «modernization» has received a practical refraction mainly in the neoliberal political course, which absolutizes the ideas of classical modernization theories about economic growth and economic freedom as the foundations of progressive development.  The neoliberal interpretation of modernization has become fundamental to the political course that  defines approaches to the implementation of «structural reforms» in «developing» countries. According to the author, the reasons for such dominance are related to both political factors, history, and  the peculiarities of the conceptual provisions of modernization theories. The dominance of the neoliberal interpretation of modernization has provoked a number of negative trends: reducing the value of freedom exclusively to economic freedoms and freedom of choice, increasing economic inequality, strengthening the political status of economic elites, etc. Despite the emergence of non-classical modernization theories in response to these contradictions, they did not become the dominant conceptual basis for reforms due to political and discursive reasons. The author comes to the conclusion that the transformation of the conceptual provisions of classical modernization theories into a neoliberal political course, postulating its provisions at the level of world political discourse significantly limited the potential of applying this theory to develop and substantiate a political course. At the same time, many of the tasks facing  the state as an institution at the present stage lie in the plane of understanding modern, non-classical theories of modernization. 

1. Potseluev S. P. Theory of Political Modernization. Political Conceptology. 2022;(3):198–215. (In Russ.).

2. Berezhnikov I. V. Theory of Modernization: The Main Stages of Evolution. Problems of Russian History. 2001;(4):217–246. (In Russ.).

3. Rostow W. W. Stages of Economic Growth. New York: Praeger; 1961. 236 p. (In Russ.).

4. Welch C. E. Political Modernization: A Reader in Comparative Political Change. Belmont, Wadsworth Publishing Company; 1967. 383 p.

5. Gordon A.V. Samuel Huntington and His Concept of Political Modernization. In: Political Order in Changing Societies. Moscow: Progress-Tradition;2004:3–16. (In Russ.).

6. Steadman-Jones D. The Birth of Neoliberal Politics: From Hayek and Friedman to Reagan and Thatcher. Moscow; Chelyabinsk: Socium, Mysl; 2019, 522 p. (In Russ.).

7. Stiglitz J. E. The Price of Inequality: How the Stratification of Society Threatens Our Future. Moscow: Eksmo; 2016. 512 p. (In Russ.).

8. Harvey D. A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Actual Reading. Moscow: Generation; 2007. 288 p. (In Russ.).

9. Rusakova O. F., Khmelinin A. A. Neoliberal Discourse: Strategies and Technologies for Constructing a New Subjectivity. Antinomies. 2012;(12):259–271. (In Russ.).

10. Dardo P., Laval K. Neoliberalism and capitalist subjectivation. Logos. 2001;1(80):103–117. (In Russ.).

11. Krugman Paul. Who Was Milton Friedman? The New York Review of Books, February. 2007. 15. Available from: https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2007/02/15/who-was-milton-friedman/ [Accessed 06 August 2024].

12. Huntington S. Political order in changing societies. Moscow: Progress-Tradition; 2004. 480 p. (In Russ.).

13. Eisenstadt S. N. Some Observations on Multiple Modernities. In: Reflections on Multiple Modernities: European, Chinese and Other Interpretations. BRILL; 2002: 27–41.

14. State’s models of modernization. Moscow: IF RAS; 2002. 151 p. (In Russ.)

15. Rodrik D. Good Bye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? Available from: https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/files/dani-rodrik/files/goodbye-washington.pdf [Accessed 09 August 2024].

16. Crouch K. The strange non-death of neoliberalism. Moscow: Delo; 2012. 272 p. (In Russ.)