Transformation of political identity in the information society: limits and contradictions
https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-1-175-180
EDN: ALBGRD
Abstract
The article deals with the transformation of political identity and elite consciousness in the modern world. The dynamics of political identification processes in the conditions of development of information exchange of network type is problematized. The aim of the research is to study the peculiarities of the political identification process under the influence of the newest forms and practices of digital communication. Its achievement is connected with the solution of two main tasks: 1) exposition of the modern political process and its key components (identity of the political ruling “class”, its elite self-consciousness) in the context of the development of information society, multiply increased intensity of urbanization processes; 2) study of the transformation of the process of political self-determination in the conditions of involvement of political subjects and structure in the information interaction of network type, dominating at the current stage of civilizational development. The change in the practice of political thinking and political legitimization of elites is considered in the context of urbanization processes and the development of the corresponding type of network urban “chronotope”.
About the Authors
D. K. GrigoryanRussian Federation
David K. Grigoryan – Cand. Sci. (Polit.), Professor at the Department of Political Science and Ethnopolitics; Associate Professor at the Department of Criminalistics and Investigative Activities
Rostov-on-Don
A. A. Khandjyan
Russian Federation
Artur A. Khandjyan – Postgraduate student, Department of Political Science and Ethnopolitics
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Fadeeva L. A. Network Identity. Political Identity and Identity Politics. 2011;(1):67–69. (In Russ.)
2. Letov E. V. Network identity in the culture of modern information society. Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Culture and Art. 2013;(4-54):62–65. (In Russ.)
3. Glazychev V. L. City without borders. Moscow: 2011. 400 р. (In Russ.)
4. Sungurov A. Yu. Time and Politics: Introduction to Chronopolitics. Saint-Petersburg; 2016. 183 р. (In Russ.)
5. Chikharev I. A. Chronopolitical research: the experience of synthesis. Polis. 2003;(6):50–61. (In Russ.)
6. Chikharev I. A. Chronopolitics: development of the research program. Polis. 2005;(3):21–33. (In Russ).
7. Chikharev I. A. Problematics of political space and time in modern political science and international studies. Political Science. 2009;(1):7–31. (In Russ.)
8. Rusakova O. F., Fatikhov S. P. Conceptual models of chronotope in humanitarian and political studies. Bulletin of SUSU, Series “Social and Humanities”. 2011;30(247):122–127. (In Russ.)
9. Bakhtin M. M. Forms of Time and Chronotope in the Novel. Essays on Historical Poetics. In: Issues of Literature and Aesthetics. 1975: 234–407. (In Russ).
10. Tretyakova T.E. Space and time of political chronotope. Totalitarianism and totalitarian consciousness. 2010;(8):65–73. (In Russ).
11. Bauman Z. Current Modernity. Saint-Petersburg; 2008. 240 р. (In Russ).
12. Grigoryan D. K., Yatskina I. A. IT-crime as the reverse side of digitalization of society. In: Scientific support of detection, investigation and prevention of crime. Materials of the All-Russian scientific-practical practical conference to the anniversary of Doctor of Law, Professor, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation Alexander A. Protasevich. Irkutsk; 2023:30–35. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Grigoryan D.K., Khandjyan A.A. Transformation of political identity in the information society: limits and contradictions. State and municipal management. Scholar notes. 2024;(1):175-180. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-1-175-180. EDN: ALBGRD






















