State management of the national economy in conditions of geopolitical instability

We consider an economic system consisting of two sectors: public (including municipal) and private. It is shown that in the structure of the economic system the public sector occupies most of the economic space. It has been established that the public sector is, as a rule, less efficient than the private sector, but is capable, unlike the private sector, of stably providing the Russian state with the products necessary to maintain national security. Based on statistical data on economic efficiency in 2023 and the volume of budget financing of the Russian military-industrial complex in 2022–2024, it was concluded that the economic model of “military Keynesianism” is being implemented in the Russian Federation. Destructive endogenous factors have been identified, including a defect in the institutional structure that reduces the effectiveness of the implemented economic model and certain problematic aspects of the functioning of a mixed economy. Some proposals have been made for the transformation of the national economy in the post-crisis period.

1. Denisenko I.F. Problems of improvement of federalism and public power system in the process of formation of new subjects of the Russian Federation. State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2024;(1):41–46. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-41-46

2. Romashchenko T. V. Gersonskaya I. V. The institutional structure of the public sector economy at the current stage of development. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Economics and Management. 2021;(2):5–14. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17308/econ.2021.2/3462

3. He Мяomio, Demina V.V. Zayikin I.A. Influence of state policy on the sectoral structure of economy. Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law. 2024;(2-1):115–122. (In Russ.).

4. Balatsky E.V., Yekimova N.A. History of civilizations in the context of relations between public and private sectors of economy. Society and economy. 2006;(4):179–191. (In Russ.).

5. Mankovsky I.A. Institutional matrix as a system-forming basis of socio-economic development. Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: Economy. 2024;(1):6–17. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18384/29495024-2024-1-6-17

6. Himchenko A.N., Plaxina A.M. State component of the corporate sector of Russian economics: structure, evaluation parameters, characteristics. Bulletin of the North Ossetian State University named after K.L. Khetagurov. 2021;(3):181–191. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29025/1994-7720-2021-3-181-191

7. Penkova I.V. Resolution of insystemic contradictions of development of the public sector economy as a factor of ensuring social and economic security of the state. Bulletin of the Donetsk National University. Series B. Economics and law. 2022;(2):193–202. (In Russ.).

8. Cheremysinov G.A., Pugachev I.O. Military Keynesianism in the concepts of long-term economic cycles. University proceedings. Volga region. Social sciences. 2016;3(39):176‒191. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21685/2072-3016-2016-3-17

9. Mankovsky I. A. The potential of applying institutionalism as a theoretical framework for public administration. State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2024;(1):59-66. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22394/2079- 1690-2024-1-1-59-66. EDN CLAMGQ

10. Chernertatsov A.M., Akhmetov L.A., Djurayev D.M. The public sector in the economy of the Russian Federation. Fundamental research. 2018;(4):138–145. (In Russ.).

11. Adokov R.H. State management of the economy: status, problems, development paths. Bulletin of the National Institute of Business. 2022;1(45):57–63. (In Russ.).

12. Viktskaya I.I., Frolova N.D. Methodological approaches to measurement and assessment of quality of management in Russian public companies. STAGE: economic theory, analysis, practice. 2023;(3):60–81. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24412/2071-6435-2023-3-60-81

13. Osokina N.V. Slazerenko E.V. Problem of effective interaction of the public and private sectors in national economy. Economic analysis: theory and practice. 2015;26(425):13–23. (In Russ.).

14. Timofeeva I.U., Lavrova E.V., Commissova E.A. and others Corruption as a consequence of privatization of state power. Sociology. 2021;(1):181–190. (In Russ.).

15. Filimonov A.V. The problem of servolism in bureaucratic organizations as a threat to national security of Russia. Academic thought. 2022;4(21):258–261. (In Russ.).