Adaptive stimulation as an element of higher education institution effective human resource management system

The article researches the problem of adaptive incentives as a significant element of an effective human resource management system of a higher education institution. The purpose of the study is to provide a methodological analysis of key aspects of team adaptation incentives using in HRM and justification of a set of measures aimed at achieving strategic goals in the field of human resource management of an educational organization. The research methodology is based on the conceptual provisions of management theory and HRM, identifying alternative approaches to resolving individual problematic components of human resource management in educational organizations. It is demonstrated that in the conditions of talent competition the focus of the system of adaptation incentives to the changing parametric characteristics of competitive socio-economic dynamics applied in HRM of higher education institution is team adaptation, which ensures the improvement of management efficiency in achieving strategic goals. The significance of the research results lies in the proposal and justification of adaptive measures that stimulate teamwork of employees of an educational organization by developing leadership and management skills, building up the system of feedback and communication, creating a favorable educational environment, etc. The implementation of the proposed activities will contribute to the improvement of HRM quality, to building competencies and motivation for teamwork.

1. Bai, Y. Innovative Mode of Human Resource Management of University Teachers Based on Intelligent Big Data Analysis. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. 2022; 1: 7345547.

2. Taiwo T. Lasisi, Elena I. Lazareva; Gor A. Abramyan; Yulia V. Gavrilova, Anton D. Murzin. Intellectual Capital and Technology as Factors of Career Success: Role of Income Inequality. Economies. 2023; 11: 63.

3. De Cieri, H., Sanders, K., Lin, C. International and comparative human resource management: an AsiaPacific perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. 2022; 60(1):116-145.

4. Lazareva, E., Anopchenko, T., Murzin, A. Human Capital in the System of Urban Territory Sustainable Development Management. Green Technologies and Infrastructure to Enhance Urban Ecosystem Services: Proceedings of the Smart and Sustainable Cities Conference 2018. Cham, 2020. С. 269-277.

5. Matsuzaki, T., Shigeno, H., Ueki, Y., Tsuji, M. Innovation upgrading of local small and medium-sized enterprises and regional innovation policy: an empirical study. Industrial Marketing Management. 2021; 94:128-136.

6. Shen, J., Benson, J., Huang, B. High-performance work systems and teachers’ work performance: the mediating role of quality of working life. Human Resource Management. 2014; 53(5): 817-833.

7. Lazareva E.I., Gavrilova Yu.V. Identification of socio-economic factors of human capital development in HR management of an organization. Russian Journal of Management. 2023; 21 (1): 89-114. (In Russ.)

8. Baard, S.K., Rench, T.A., Kozlowski, S.W.J. Performance adaptation: A theoretical integration and review. Journal of Management. 2014; 40(1): 48-99.

9. Burke, C. S., Stagl, K.C., Klein, C. et al. What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A metaanalysis. The Leadership Quarterly. 2006; 3: 288-307.

10. Maynard, M. T., Kennedy, D. M., & Sommer, S. A. Team adaptation: A fifteen-year synthesis (1998-2013) and framework for how this literature needs to “adapt” going forward. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2015; 24(5): 652-677.

11. DeRue, D. S., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M. D. et al. How different team downsizing approaches influence team-level adaptation and performance. Academy of Management Journal. 2008; 51(1): 182-196.

12. Marks, M. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Mathieu, J. E. Performance implications of leader briefings and teaminteraction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2000; 85(6): 971-986.

13. Burke, E.K., Petrovic, S., Qu, R. Case based heuristic selection for timetabling problems. Journal of Scheduling. 2006; 9: 115-132.

14. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., Smith, E. M. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. The changing nature of work performance: Implications for staffing, personnel actions, and development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 1999: 240-292.

15. Marks, Michelle A., John E. Mathieu, and Stephen J. Zaccaro. A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes. The Academy of Management Review. 2001; 3: 356-76.

16. Chen, Guoquan & Liu, Chunhong & Tjosvold, Dean. Conflict Management for Effective Top Management Teams and Innovation in China. Journal of Management Studies. 2005; 42: 277-300.

17. Zajac, S., Gregory, M. E., Bedwell, W. L. et al. The cognitive underpinnings of adaptive team performance in ill-defined task situations: A closer look at team cognition. Organizational Psychology Review. 2014; 4(1), 49-73.

18. Cannon-Bowers, J., Salas E., Converse S. Shared mental models in expert team decision making. Current issues in individual and group decision making. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1993: 221-246.

19. Gersick, C. J., & Hackman, J. R. Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1990; 47(1): 65-97.

20. Lazareva E.I., Karpova S.V. Personnel motivation as a source of increasing the effectiveness of organizational management: adaptation of foreign models. Innovative trends in international business and sustainable management: proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference (Rostov-on-Don, November 17-19, 2022). Novokuznetsk, ZNANIE-M, 2023: 172-178. (In Russ.)