Innovative digital technologies in the electoral process: political and legal characteristics
EDN: UUCDTR
Abstract
Introduction. Digital innovation technologies are becoming an integral element of the transformation of modern political systems, having a significant impact on the structure and dynamics of the electoral process. Their implementation is accompanied not only by an increase in the efficiency and accessibility of electoral procedures, but also by the emergence of new political and legal risks related to legitimacy, transparency and regulatory regulation.
Purpose. A political and legal analysis of the digitalization of the electoral process in the Russian Federation with an emphasis on institutional models for the introduction of innovative technologies.
Methods. A comparative legal analysis of the stages of implementing digital solutions during the 2019 Moscow elections, the 2020 nationwide vote on amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, and the 2021 State Duma elections. Theoretical and methodological modeling of approaches to the digital transformation of the electoral process using institutional and systems approaches.
Results. It was established that the digitalization of the electoral system in Russia is being carried out through a mixed approach, combining technological neutrality with elements of legal institutionalization. Five conceptual models for implementing digital technologies in elections were identified, each differing in the degree of regulatory intervention and transformation of electoral procedures. Key problem areas in the digitalization of the electoral process were outlined–regulatory fragmentation and the issue of legitimacy of electoral procedures and the public's trust in their outcomes.
Conclusion. Digitalization of the electoral process is a politically significant process of implementing mechanisms for democratic participation. In the context of ongoing regulatory fragmentation and public distrust, the key political and legal challenge is the development of a sustainable strategy for managing the digitalization of elections, which can simultaneously maintain institutional stability and adapt to the demands of the digital age.
About the Authors
M. A. KaplyukRussian Federation
Maksim A. Kaplyuk – Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Vice-Rector for External Relations and Industrial Practice, Rostov State Transport University.
Rostov-on-Don
A. A. Kashina
Russian Federation
Anastasia A. Kashina – Assistant at the Department of State and Municipal Administration, Rostov State Transport University.
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Khalin V.G., Chernova G.V. Digitalization and its impact on the Russian economy and society: advantages, challenges, threats and risks. Management Consulting. 2018;10(118):46–63. (In Russ.)
2. Kiseleva N.V. Electronic voting in Russia: the concept and types. Actual problems of the theory and history of the legal system of society. 2020;19(19):36–43. (In Russ.)
3. Kozlova A.S., Ponyavina M.B. Problems of electronic voting. News of scientific achievements. Economics and Law. 2020;(3):93–100. (In Russ.)
4. Berlyavsky L.G., Makhova A.V. Electoral rights in the digital age. Legal technology. 2021;(15):478–483. (In Russ.)
5. Gritsenko E.V. Ensuring basic guarantees of electoral rights in the context of informatization of the electoral process. Constitutional and municipal law. 2020;(5);41–49. (In Russ.)
6. Kolyushin E. I. Innovative technologies of the electoral process in the light of the rule of law. Justice. 2021;3(3):124–150. (In Russ.)
7. Alvarez RM, Hall TE. Electronic Elections: The Perils and Promises of Digital Democracy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2008. 256 p.
8. Makhova A.V., Rokotyanskaya A.A. Digitalization of the electoral process in Russia: legal aspects. Legal order and legal values. 2024;2(3):39–45. (In Russ.)
9. Kotelnikova M.K., Tulegenova N.A. Digitalization of the electoral process in Russia. In: Modern trends in regional development: management, law, economics, society. Materials of the XXI All-Russian Student Scientific and practical conference. Chelyabinsk; 2023:133–136. (In Russ.)
10. Efanova E.V. Digitalization of the electoral process: advantages and disadvantages. Socio-humanitarian technologies. 2024;3(31):31–37. (In Russ.)
11. Tumanyan G.V. Remote electronic voting as a stage in the development of anthropocentric public administration. State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2022;(1);306–310. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kaplyuk M.A., Kashina A.A. Innovative digital technologies in the electoral process: political and legal characteristics. State and municipal management. Scholar notes. 2025;(2):204-211. (In Russ.) EDN: UUCDTR





















