The potential of axiological and civilizational approaches for the development of civic education in modern Russia
EDN: WDPTFY
Abstract
Introduction. The development of civic consciousness becomes a key aspect in creating a strong and mature society. This is due to the need to educate people who are ready to actively participate in public life. This is especially true for Russia, where current socio-political challenges require the involvement of all segments of the population. A comprehensive approach to civic education implies fundamental changes in the philosophy of the educational space of modern Russia, namely, the return of the educational component in the program of activities of educational institutions.
Purpose. To analyze the experience of applying the axiological and civilizational approach to the study of civic identity.
Theoretical basis. One of the key tasks of the axiological approach is to search for and analyze the fundamental principles on which the social life of the country and its statehood are based. Such value dominants in modern Russia today are family and traditions, social harmony and patriotism. The realization of the axiological approach to civic education faces a number of challenges, including the need to overcome the legacy of the Soviet period, when the formation of civic identity was often carried out within the framework of hermetic ideological constructs. Today, the task is to engage young people in active participation in society, based on Russia's unique historical experience, which is one of the key components of the civilizational approach. Special attention will be paid to the operationalization of the concepts of citizenship and patriotism; the thesis of interdependence of the categories of civic and patriotic will be put forward. This approach allows more productively designing programs of civic education, building them into the system of continuous socialization of a citizen.
Results. In modern society, the need to activate civic awareness and understanding of historical and cultural heritage comes to the forefront. This process requires the development of innovative strategies, especially in the context of educational work with young people. Key problems in this area are the lack of a sustainable value system that could serve as a basis, as well as the lack of coherence that prevents the formation of effective mechanisms of social activism.
Conclusions. The study of the application of axiological and civilizational approaches in the study of civic identity has allowed us to identify the key problematic aspects facing the sphere of civic education in Russia, as well as to formulate strategies for its optimization and development in the future.
About the Author
O. A. ShokinaRussian Federation
Olga A. Shokina – PhD Candidate, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
Moscow
References
1. Zdravomyslov A.G. Needs, interests, values. Moscow; Politizdat, 1986. 223 c. (In Russ.)
2. Yadov V.A. Interrelation of value orientations and social attitudes. In: Self-regulation and prediction of social behaviour of personality: dispositional concept. Moscow: LLC ‘Centre for Social Forecasting and Marketing’; 2013: 78–88. (In Russ.)
3. Yadov V.A. What is the need for a national Russian sociology today? Sociological Studies. 2008;4(288):16–20. (In Russ.)
4. Bondarevskaya E.V. Philosophical and conceptual foundations of systemic modernisation of pedagogical education. Izvestia Volgograd State Pedagogical University. 2014;9(94):19-26. (In Russ.)
5. Bondarevskaya E.V. Value bases of the personally oriented education. Pedagogika. 2007;8:44-53. (In Russ.)
6. Nikandrov N.D. Spiritual and moral culture and Russian school. Higher education today. 2009;3: 30–35. (In Russ.)
7. Slastenin, V.A., Podymova, L.S. Teacher's readiness to innovative activity. Siberian pedagogical journal. 2007;1: 42–49. (in Russ.)
8. Slastenin, V.A. Quality of education: experience of philosophical and phenomenological analysis (in Russian). Pedagogical journal of Bashkortostan. 2006;2(2):5–13. (In Russ.)
9. Ivanova N.A. Axiological approach to the formation of citizenship of adolescents in the conditions of secondary school: abstract of the dissertation for the candidacy of candidate of pedagogical sciences. Kolomna; 2011. (In Russ.)
10. Mchedlova M.M., Bukin O.A. Russian civilisation: civilizational approach in political theory. Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Political Science. 2023;25(2):445–454. (In Russ.)
11. Mchedlova M.M. Political meanings of the civilisational paradigm. In: Political science in a changing world: new practices and theoretical search. Materials of the All-Russian Conference of RAPN with international participation. M: Publisher: Peoples' Friendship University of Russia; 2023:391–392. (In Russ.)
12. Dugin A.G. Noomakhia: wars of the mind. Images of Russian thought. Solnechny tsar, Blik Sofia i Rus' Podzemnaya. Moscow: Academic Project; 2020. 980 p. (In Russ.)
13. Dugin A.G. Noomakhia: wars of the mind. Russian Logos I. The kingdom of the earth. The structure of Russian identity. Moscow: Academic Project; 2019. 959 p. (In Russ.)
14. Dugin A.G. Noomakhia: wars of the mind. Russkii Logos II Russkii historial People and the state in search of the subject. Moscow: Academic Project; 2019. 462 p. (In Russ.)
15. Kiselev S.G. The Basic Instinct of Civilisations and Geopolitical Challenges of Russia. Moscow: Izvestia Publishing House; 2002. 368 p. (In Russ.)
16. Kara-Murza S.G. Manipulation of consciousness. Moscow: Eksmo-Press; 2002. 832 p. (In Russ.)
17. Panarin A.S. Orthodox civilisation in the global world. Moscow: Algorithm; 2002. 496 p. (In Russ.)
18. Vakulova T.V., Kovaleva N.S. Features of the civilisation approach in pedagogy research. Concept. 2020;8:1-19. (In Russ.)
19. Pantin I.V. National-civilizational identity. In: Identity: personality, society, politics. Encyclopedic edition. Edited by Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences I.S. Semenenko. RAS I.S. Semenenko. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo “All World”; 2017:461–464. (In Russ.)
20. Merry M.S. Patriotism, History and the Legitimate Aims of American Education. In: Patriotism and Citizenship Education. Edited by B. Haynes. Blackwell Publishing;2009:1–20.
21. Gayazov A.C. Education and education of a citizen in the modern world. M.: Nauka; 2003. 256 p. (In Russ.)
22. Filonov G.I. The phenomenon of citizenship in the structure of personal development. Pedagogika. 2007;8:38–44. (In Russ.)
23. Loginova N.V. Civil education as an object of pedagogical research. Man and Education. 2009;1(18):53–57. (In Russ.)
24. Vulfov B.Z. The purpose and essence of civic education. In: Education of a citizen in the Soviet school. Edited by G.N. Filonov. Мoscow;1990:29–35. (In Russ.)
25. Sergeeva V.V. Education of civil society members responsible for the fate of the country. Bulletin of the National Institute of Business. 2022;3(47):113–117. (In Russ.)
26. Lutovinov V.I. In the patriotism of youth – the future of Russia. Moscow: Andrei Pervozvanny Foundation; 2019. 170 p. (In Russ.)
27. Mazur M.A., Vanyukova Y.A. Evolution of the concepts of patriotism and patriotic education. Psychopedagogy in law enforcement agencies. 2010;4: 51–53. (In Russ.)
28. Gryaznova E.V. Social memory as an element of culture. Man and Culture. 2015;5:92–106. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Shokina O.A. The potential of axiological and civilizational approaches for the development of civic education in modern Russia. State and municipal management. Scholar notes. 2025;(2):252-263. (In Russ.) EDN: WDPTFY





















